Comments on: Case of the Accidental Drowning

By: katie

katie — Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:10:18 +0000

I don’t know if this page is still active, but I would love to see the answers. Since adobe flash player no longer works or exists, it’s impossible to see the answers so i wonder if this could be updated. Trying to show this to my students for a detective quest they are going to be doing soon but can’t if I don’t know the answer given.

By: mysteries

mysteries — Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:05:25 +0000

I kind’a knew the answer.

By: Billy Mitchell

Billy Mitchell — Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:54:36 +0000

I figured out what happened to Jim! I’m not going to tell because a I’d ruin it for a lot of people!

By: JOSHIEEE DDDDD

JOSHIEEE DDDDD — Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:25:32 +0000

this is really cool but i am stuck in school

By: cupid

cupid — Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:41:28 +0000

LOVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEe

By: Jesse

Jesse — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:34:30 +0000

I loved it❤❤

By: Clay Morgan

Clay Morgan — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:57:39 +0000

Was not to sure if you wanted an e-mail for the answer. First off i know nothing about canoeing, so that already stumped me. I thought the survivor was in the front and that he would have had to have turned around to strike his so called friend. What also tipped off that it was murder was the life jackets that were left behind, if your wearing a life jacket your chances of drowning are greatly reduced. The fact that the tanned fellow did not see his buddy fall is suspicious also. All in all the cracked paddle was the ultimate giveaway for me. What i learned from this short story is to look closely at your work and look for more than an obvious answer.

By: Hiram

Hiram — Sun, 03 Jun 2012 23:38:26 +0000

My First thought was that i know very little about canoeing, but i also know that rapids dont crack or break padels that easey. Once the Detective questionsed him, his response is what set the tone and gave away his actions. The mans first remark that hinted to the detective and me was that he was the driver, and yet he sat in front. that was strike one. Strike two was that his paddle was completely broken and his friends was just cracked.
On the other hand, he could be telling the truth and just be shakin up about the accident, which can cause the story be be a little shaky

By: Aric Eardley

Aric Eardley — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:08:38 +0000

My first reaction was that Jim was telling the truth. It seems like a plausible enough story to me. As an inspector I would be suspicious of the unused life jackets in the back, but it would not be the first time people do not use appropriate safety devices. The cracked paddle is also suspicious but I can see how Jim may crack it on the rocks like he indicated. If I was investigating this scene I would take Jim at his word and begin looking for his friend. Upon finding his friend I would inspect the injuries and draw conclusions based on the findings. Until then I would trust Jim.

By: admin

admin — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:34:31 +0000

Fantastic! Glad to see them put to use.